I’m looking into making short films but my Canon IXUS now has a shutter problem, so I thought I might as well get a new one. So in my case, which is more worth it? Are HD DSLR cameras that bad?
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
| Bundle Monster 4pc. Padded Neoprene Compact DSLR Camera Lens / Lense Protector Pouch Bag Kit For Canon, Nikon, Etc |
 |
| List Price: Varies based on product options |
| Amazon Price: $15.50 |
| Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras |
 |
| List Price: $299.99 |
| Amazon Price: Too low to display |
| Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens |
 |
| List Price: $200.00 |
| Amazon Price: Too low to display |
| Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras |
 |
| List Price: $1,100.00 |
| Amazon Price: Too low to display |
| Microscope Adapter for Canon D-SLR with 2X Lens |
 |
| List Price: $146.00 |
| Amazon Price: $79.95 |
Posted in 
Tags: 
I have recently purchased a new nikon d90.
It has a great movie feature which IS HD. Also it is a cracking camera and it hasn’t let me down yet.
This may be a bit overpriced for what you’re looking for though.
I agree with what is said above, if it is just for video spend your money on a great hd video camera.
But if you think you’ll change your mind and go into still photography then i strongly recommend the Nikon D90.
If it *is* just for movies, then an HD camcorder will be better.
dSLRs with movie recording ability are ok, but the movie recording is always an after-thought.
Personally I would go for the camcorder option.